Beijing time on April 7 before dawn message, on hearing that holds in Zhou Wu, an a:appellant court of American did not show the intention that supportive apple requests almost, its content is to prohibit instantly SamSung (small gain) partial smartphone and flat computer sell on American market.
In the patent dispute of this high risk, most popular selling brooch pins itinerate appeal court listened to American federal to concern a federal judge the argument with whether right court decision will be made in December last year, this judge court decision says at that time, the apple fails to offer enough evidence to support the ban that prohibits selling SamSung Galaxy range of products. The response that the judge of this appeal court makes after listening to argument is a premise that puts forward to malic lawyer express doubt, namely the apple does not need to prove existence is causal between patent tort and client prediction of a person's luck in a given year to win a ban.
· of Er of malic lawyer Michael Yagebusi (Michael Jacobs) says, factual enough proves SamSung encroached an apple probably scooby costume to be used at the patent of the product such as IPhone, this apple is damaged probably accordingly. The judge of court of confederative itinerate appeal expresses, they noticed these facts, but can't prove patent tort and existence of user prediction of a person's luck in a given year are causal.
The judge Williams · of front courtyard of this domestic discipline exercised by the head of a feudal household Bulaisen (the situation that William Bryson) offerred sex of a hypothesis, namely how manufacturer of a car from another a per most popular selling memory lap free t mobile prepaid cards top toshiba son of same business cup type insulator was copied over there the company the design of snail foot, so the argument according to the apple, if the market share of the 2nd company drops somewhat in subsequently time, the activity that can say the first company sells a car so and this existence are causal, but this is incorrect judgment apparently. dog crates large
Another judge Shalun Pulaosite (Sharon Prost) also expresses, offer certain it is very important to can prove causal evidence is. She points out, elephantine client prediction of a person's luck in a given year such harm " may cause because of be different from the reason of patent tort completely " .
The case of patent tort litigation between SamSung and apple will be in in July be on trial be on trial of court of Californi the most popular t mobile prepaid cards a city federal. Yagebusi expresses, the apple hopes the proof on the horse is causal, because,be although this company can win the lawsuit, also cannot be by 2012 be benefited from which before.
Apple and SamSung agree to accused on April 13 the court submits letter up before, content is concerned how best protects the confidential information in this case. A:appellant court may be in about the court d the best selling t mobile prepaid cards ecision of this case future any time make.
Current, apple and SamSung are launching patent litigation big fight ins the most popular memory card digital cameras ide global limits, already initiated relevant accusation in 10 countries at least, the reason is two companies hope to be on flat computer and smartphone market portion of race to cont free scooby costume rol. (Tang Feng)
No comments:
Post a Comment